A California lawmaker is shaking things up by introducing a new bill which some are labeling as “gun control.” However, the bill is very different from previous gun laws.
The new legislation seeks to decrease California’s suicide rates by stopping potentially suicidal customers from purchasing a gun.
Sounds good so far – however, what’s concerning is how they’re going about it. After all, preventing those contemplating suicide from purchasing a gun sounds like a great course of action. But will this actually lower suicide rates?
According to U.S. News, if someone is afraid they are at risk of suicide, they can confidentially give their name to their state office that handles the background checks for gun purchases. By doing this, the individual can help keep themselves safe and can help protect themselves from buying a firearm.
Unfortunately, according to Bonta’s office, suicide is reaching staggering numbers in California. In 2015, 1,051 claimed their own lives in suicide.
Even more shocking, Bonta’s website reports that one study’s findings show that Californians are approximately 57 times more susceptible to committing suicide during the first seven days after buying a new gun. This is despite the state’s 10-day waiting period, which is mandatory.
Here’s some more information from U.S. News:
Rather than having a doctor tell the government that an individual should not own a firearm or have a judge decide an individual is “considered likely to harm themselves,” this bill would allow people to give up their Second Amendment right willingly.
One of the main problems of combatting depression and suicide is that an individual can be struggling with them and no one would know otherwise unless signs become apparent and someone asks the important, yet tough, questions. Would people contemplating suicide tell the government how they felt, even though they were unwilling to seek help in another way? That may not be answerable unless the bill were to become law and the effects of the legislation are analyzed.
As an example of hidden depression, a recent celebrity death comes to mind. In July of last year, Chester Bennington, the lead singer of Linkin Park, took his life in his California home (and not with a gun). Days before his death, Chester appeared to be happy and enjoying life with his family. No one expected a thing, and his passing devastated his friends and family, as well as the music industry.
Once a person submits their name to the state’s background check system, the office would notify licensed gun dealers that the person is prohibited from legally buying a firearm, SFGate says. Through a process involving a court hearing, a person may have their name removed from the list upon showing they are no longer a danger to themselves.
In other words, the person forgoes their constitutional right, and if they receive treatment for their depression and suicidal thoughts, they will have to prove they are no longer a harm to themselves to get that right back. That’s the danger of sacrificing rights, no matter the reason.
The law may be well-intentioned, but it may be tough to sell the idea that those struggling with suicidal thoughts will tell the government about it. Secondly, even though a gun may be out of the picture, sadly, it doesn’t mean the suicide won’t occur. The potential for tragedy isn’t averted. Lastly, the legislation, again, appears to regulate a tool rather than help the person overcome the cause of their despair. The person can give up their right, but that doesn’t help that person’s inner turmoil.
Would the government somehow mandate counseling to help that individual further? The left-wing organization known as The Coalition To Stop Gun Violence may answer that question. Its websitestates, “CSGV is committed to pursuing policies that reduce access to deadly weapons and ensure those in crisis get the help they need without stigmatizing those who live with mental illness.”
Steps should be taken to prevent those who are suicidal and mentally ill from obtaining firearms. Proponents of the Second Amendment endorse that position. Though this legislation doesn’t hurt law-abiding gun owners and is left up to every individual, asking people to self-report and jump through hoops to get their right back seems far-fetched. But I would be happy to be proven otherwise.